Editorial: Digital effects are not killing the business, just about everything else is.
I hear it time and time again. There is no work. My friends, people with years upon years of experience working on some of the highest profile films you know – are out of work still. I say still and I mean still…from last year! Now that’s a dry spell! All their social and professional network contacts generally say the same thing: ”Nothing going on” or “Hey it looks like this shop may be hiring” Suddenly everyone plows over to that shop and finds all the positions filled…weeks ago…for two days of work on a commercial. Many times, when people do get work they are urged to “keep their mouths shut about it” by shop office managers, for fear of a deluge of resumes from incredibly overqualified people that the shop owner then has to turn away (and feels bad about by the way).
There are also the ranks of SFX pros that have diversified into other endeavors or that have left the biz altogether. They cite the same mantra over and over. The influx of incredibly cheap (or free) labor by “schools” promising a career as the next Rick Baker is a frequent and favorite gripe. Another one is that the studios are just not making big budget effects driven films anymore. Of course, shop owners are just being the best businesspeople they know how. While trying to save their business, their skin and if possible stay above water – people get pay cuts or let go. It’s no different in any business office.
One disturbing shop trend now though has been to let the more experienced (and yes expensive) people go and bring in those crops of inexpensive interns. Responsibility is placed on supervisors to get the work done, on time and under budget. Supervisor positions are sometimes filled with quality craftspeople that attempt to compensate for nearly no experience in their crew (and get blamed when it all goes wrong). When people start to get some experience, they feel justified enough to raise their prices. Then shops find new people.
This does not apply if you are someone with a name, a reputation. Right? Wrong. Dead wrong. Sure people with the names and the skill sets that demand top dollar get work occasionally, but it’s not as often as you might think. I am aware of several people that are known within the business as the finest at what they do. They get hired even less than the new people. Many have sadly moved on to other things. It’s all the bottom line.
Clearly everyone thinks it’s one thing or another. They think it’s driven by laziness or lack of loyalty, gossip or greed but truth be told it’s simply not one thing at all. It’s a series of things all working in concert to bring down a once amazing, inspiring and colorful industry. There is no rubber rockstars anymore. I was told once by someone who will remain nameless, “there was a time when we would walk on set and it was like a michael bay film. We walked on set in slow mo, we were like gods.” Clearly those days are gone as hell. Maybe to some extent, it’s for the best but would it kill a production to actually credit the people that made the film watchable? Do you think a movie like G.I. Joe had any level of success because it was well written? Don’t answer that.
The way I see it, this industry has suffered (partial list):
- Several back to back strikes in recent years that the business never fully recovered from
- A governator that until recently (see June 1) didn’t give a crap about runaway productions or tax incentives
- The worst economic downturn since the great depression and it’s subsequent credit crisis (Producers can’t get credit, the money doesn’t flow, people)
- Nosediving practical effects budgets and shortened deadlines
- DRAMATICALLY diminished definitions about what is “good enough” for the screen
- Saturated labor market thanks to schools cranking out lackluster, wide-eyed optimists every six weeks
- Raised expectations about what’s possible and a sincere lack of imagination from filmmakers – thanks primarily to CG.
How can a small businessman trying to eke out a buck making monsters be expected to do anything but watch his bottom line and his back? Start by resetting expectations…next time in part 2.
To be continued.

Comment by ryk fortuna on 21 June 2010:
APPLAUSE ! Thank you from a veteran.
Comment by Editor on 21 June 2010:
Thanks! Stay tuned. This is a multi part editorial – Next I hope to talk to Shop owners (anonymously if necessary) and get their perspective.
Comment by Tara Murphy on 21 June 2010:
You just described my life. I need a drink…
Comment by Editor on 21 June 2010:
It’s really a sad state of affairs. I hope this series of articles can at least spark discussion about the state of the biz. Sad though that all those students, full of hope, will fight to get in anyway.
Comment by Ian Wingrove on 22 June 2010:
Good article which puts it’s finger on the current problems within the film/effects industry experience is not valued anymore nobody wants to learn the job from the ground up & I mean everybody not only effects people the corporate kiddiwinks are running the show
Comment by Drew on 22 June 2010:
“Eke,” not “eek.” Journalistic credibility requires correct grammar and spelling.
Comment by Editor on 22 June 2010:
Thanks Drew, I would never consider what I do “Journalism”. To do so would insult Tom Brokaw.
Comment by emt training on 25 June 2010:
Valuable info. Lucky me I found your site by accident, I bookmarked it.
Comment by Troy on 28 June 2010:
I would also add the globalization of post-production jobs. Especially animation. A lot of jobs that would otherwise have been here – are now in Signapore, Taiwan and India.
Comment by The Mask Doctor on 29 June 2010:
In the ’80s, which was the last,and most prolific gasp of the rubber-driven horror films, there were many smaller companies that were making those films. Those companies(New Line, Smart Egg, Tri Star,etc) have now been gobbled up by the big studios that don’t waste their time and money very often on originality. The last of these companies, working in a quasi-independent way was Lions Gate, who, now that they’ve made their mark, no longer makes horror flicks.
Yes, in a way, digital effects DID help to kill the rubber monster, and appliance film industry. It was a new technology that allowed filmmakers to make more realistic effects on a large scale. Due to this, we saw new ways to cinematically destroy the entire planet, rather than just kill a handful of teenagers at a slumber party, or wherever. One of the first of these (after Jurassic Park) was the Godzilla remake. Big monster, and big destruction. Then we froze the planet in The Day After Tomorrow, and the list of mass-destruction films went on…